Thursday, April 18, 2013

Big Star shines again in Nothing Can Hurt Me | Movie Review ...

The deepest hurt in Big Star: Nothing Can Hurt Me occurs far from the world of rock 'n' roll, on a living room couch, where David Bell and Sara Stewart sit talking about the death of their brother, Chris Bell. As a founding member of the Memphis guitar-pop band Big Star, Bell collaborated with fellow singer-songwriter Alex Chilton on #1 Record (1972), a dazzling combination of folk, jangle-pop, and hard rock that won ecstatic reviews in the music press but was doomed by poor distribution. Bell quit the band in frustration, and a solo career went nowhere; by the time he died in a car crash in 1978, he was working at a fast-food restaurant. Now Big Star is the most beloved cult band in all of rock, but to Bell's siblings this is small consolation. When Stewart tearfully confesses that she resents Big Star, David sympathizes with her: "You'd rather have him instead of having the music out there."

Stewart seems quite alone in that moment, completely at odds with the movie's agenda and yet perfectly in sync with the sense of painful isolation that was central to Big Star's music. That feeling of being misunderstood by the rest of the world runs all through Nothing Can Hurt Me, which screens Friday at the Logan as part of the Chicago International Movies & Music Festival. The movie suffers from a fannish myopia; director Drew DeNicola edited the movie himself, and his account saunters along for 112 minutes, dwelling too long on Chilton's solo career and Big Star's kinda-sorta reunion (featuring Chilton, drummer Jody Stephens, and two new guys) for a victory lap in the 90s. Yet the spine of the story survives, one of extraordinary creative accomplishment followed by bitter rejection; fused with the band's lonely music, which DeNicola samples liberally on the soundtrack, it has the power of a pop myth.

You have to be pretty cocky to call yourself Big Star and your first album #1 Record. Bell was among the novice recording engineers trained by Ardent Studios in Memphis when it began to pick up overflow sessions from the great soul label Stax Records, across town; Ardent founder John Fry (who appears in the documentary and also served as music supervisor) let his most promising students record their own projects for free, and Bell took advantage of this situation to start recording original material with Stephens, bassist Andy Hummel, and Chilton, already a former teen idol with the Box Tops. Everyone who heard their music was blown away, and when Stax offered to put the studio's label, Ardent Records, under its distribution umbrella, the pieces were all in place for Big Star?their name borrowed, in last-minute desperation, from a local grocery store chain?to break big. "I realized it was a matter of probabilities," recalls Bell's friend Steve Rhea, who worked at Ardent promoting the band, "but for Chris it was a hundred percent certain this thing was gonna all take off."

The band's confidence began to waver, and then wilted, as Rhea called radio stations around the country to plug the record and began hearing that no one could find it in stores. Stax was a soul label that didn't understand the rock market, and #1 Record, with its Beatlesesque shimmer and delicate acoustic laments, was fatally out of sync with the boogying cock rock of the moment. Carole Manning, who designed the cover art (and who died in 2010), remembers her confusion when the record failed to hit: "What's going on? We've got all these great reviews, Stax seems to be behind it, the record's great. You know, what is going on out there? And 'out there' is such a netherworld; you don't know what is 'out there.'" Stephens remembers getting phone calls from people who'd read reviews and wanted to know how they could get hold of the album. Disappointed, the band members began turning on each other, and Bell finally quit, upset that critics had ignored him and focused on Chilton.

This sent Bell on a long, lonely odyssey to get his music recognized, even as the rest of the band, buoyed by a triumphant live show at a rock writers' convention in Memphis, regrouped for a second, more R&B-tinged album, Radio City (1974). According to Fry, a drug overdose landed Bell in the hospital, and David Bell says his brother was drinking heavily by the time he traveled to the UK to mix some of his new music with Beatles engineer Geoff Emerick. Nothing came of this venture, and Bell returned home to obscurity, trying to reconcile his drug addiction with the devout Christianity that had given his songs such a spiritual lift. One bright moment arrived when Chris Stamey, who had played in Chilton's backup band (and later formed the dB's), used his Car Records label to issue a single of Bell's soaring "I Am the Cosmos." Its opening lyric?"Every night I tell myself I am the cosmos, I am the wind / But that don't get you back again"?was classic Big Star, contrasting the infinitely great and the pitifully small.

DeNicola's desire to include everything there is to know about Big Star may be the movie's Achilles heel, but on the plus side, it also results in a strong sense of the eccentric Memphis arts community of the late 60s and early 70s. Record producer Jim Dickinson (who died in 2009) recalls meeting Alex Chilton as a 12-year-old "art brat" whose mother ran a local gallery; they were at a house party and the boy was tripping on peyote given to him by photographer William Eggleston. The creative hothouse of Ardent Studios is warmly remembered by Fry, engineer Richard Rosebrough, Stephens, and Hummel (who died in 2010). They evoke a strong sense of community, though if you've ever been to Memphis or any other small southern city, you probably know that even this comes with a feeling of detachment from the rest of the world, which some welcome and others resent.

Chilton, who declined to be interviewed (and died of a heart attack in March 2010), had such an ambivalent attitude toward Big Star that if he'd participated in this documentary, it would have been a much different story. He went his own way as a solo performer, experimenting with everything from swamp boogie to Tin Pan Alley and brushing off calls for Big Star songs at his live shows. When Big Star re-formed in the 90s, he treated the band with the same amused cynicism he directed toward his nostalgia package tours with the Box Tops. The overflowing ardor of second-generation Big Star fans supplies DeNicola with the happy ending almost every documentary maker secretly craves. But it also blunts the edge of a story that's essentially tragic, filled with the disappointment of exposing oneself emotionally and discovering that no one is interested. Big Star may have burned brightly, but it did so in a vast, black emptiness, its light taking years to reach the earth.

Big Star: Nothing Can Hurt Me plays Friday night as part of the fifth annual Chicago International Movies & Music Festival. Head here for the rest of our coverage.

Source: http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/big-star-nothing-can-hurt-me/Content?oid=9322323

big ten tournament 2012 dennis quaid bruce weber fired notorious big

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Goldman Sachs' net rises 5 percent on underwriting

(AP) ? Goldman Sachs reported first-quarter results that beat analysts' forecasts thanks to a pickup in stock and bond underwriting.

The bank earned $2.2 billion in the first quarter, up 5 percent from a year ago.

The earnings were equivalent to $4.29 per share. Analysts polled by FactSet had expected $3.90 per share.

Revenue was $10.1 billion, up 1 percent from a year ago. That also beat analysts' forecast of $9.7 billion.

The investment bank underwrote more stock and bond offerings, though the unit that trades on behalf of clients was down over the year. Goldman said it would continue to focus on cutting costs.

Goldman Sachs' stock was up 0.4 percent in pre-market trading Tuesday, rising 54 cents to $147.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2013-04-16-Earns-Goldman%20Sachs/id-09f2d439c8494994bcb5e4a46ff71ebc

mariners mets shades of grey pittsburgh penguins

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Small in size, big on power: New microbatteries the most powerful yet

Small in size, big on power: New microbatteries the most powerful yet [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 16-Apr-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Liz Ahlberg
eahlberg@illinois.edu
217-244-1073
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. Though they be but little, they are fierce. The most powerful batteries on the planet are only a few millimeters in size, yet they pack such a punch that a driver could use a cellphone powered by these batteries to jump-start a dead car battery and then recharge the phone in the blink of an eye.

Developed by researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the new microbatteries out-power even the best supercapacitors and could drive new applications in radio communications and compact electronics.

Led by William P. King, the Bliss Professor of mechanical science and engineering, the researchers published their results in the April 16 issue of Nature Communications.

"This is a whole new way to think about batteries," King said. "A battery can deliver far more power than anybody ever thought. In recent decades, electronics have gotten small. The thinking parts of computers have gotten small. And the battery has lagged far behind. This is a microtechnology that could change all of that. Now the power source is as high-performance as the rest of it."

With currently available power sources, users have had to choose between power and energy. For applications that need a lot of power, like broadcasting a radio signal over a long distance, capacitors can release energy very quickly but can only store a small amount. For applications that need a lot of energy, like playing a radio for a long time, fuel cells and batteries can hold a lot of energy but release it or recharge slowly.

"There's a sacrifice," said James Pikul, a graduate student and first author of the paper. "If you want high energy you can't get high power; if you want high power it's very difficult to get high energy. But for very interesting applications, especially modern applications, you really need both. That's what our batteries are starting to do. We're really pushing into an area in the energy storage design space that is not currently available with technologies today."

The new microbatteries offer both power and energy, and by tweaking the structure a bit, the researchers can tune them over a wide range on the power-versus-energy scale.

The batteries owe their high performance to their internal three-dimensional microstructure. Batteries have two key components: the anode (minus side) and cathode (plus side). Building on a novel fast-charging cathode design by materials science and engineering professor Paul Braun's group, King and Pikul developed a matching anode and then developed a new way to integrate the two components at the microscale to make a complete battery with superior performance.

With so much power, the batteries could enable sensors or radio signals that broadcast 30 times farther, or devices 30 times smaller. The batteries are rechargeable and can charge 1,000 times faster than competing technologies imagine juicing up a credit-card-thin phone in less than a second. In addition to consumer electronics, medical devices, lasers, sensors and other applications could see leaps forward in technology with such power sources available.

"Any kind of electronic device is limited by the size of the battery until now," King said. "Consider personal medical devices and implants, where the battery is an enormous brick, and it's connected to itty-bitty electronics and tiny wires. Now the battery is also tiny."

Now, the researchers are working on integrating their batteries with other electronics components, as well as manufacturability at low cost.

"Now we can think outside of the box," Pikul said. "It's a new enabling technology. It's not a progressive improvement over previous technologies; it breaks the normal paradigms of energy sources. It's allowing us to do different, new things."

The National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research supported this work. King also is affiliated with the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology; the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory; the Micro and Nanotechnology Laboratory; and the department of electrical and computer engineering at the U. of I.

###

Editor's note: To reach William King, call 217-244-3864; email wpk@illinois.edu.

The paper, "High Power Lithium Ion Micro Batteries From Interdigitated Three-Dimensional Bicontinuous Nanoporous Electrodes," is available online at http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v4/n4/full/ncomms2747.html.


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Small in size, big on power: New microbatteries the most powerful yet [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 16-Apr-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Liz Ahlberg
eahlberg@illinois.edu
217-244-1073
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. Though they be but little, they are fierce. The most powerful batteries on the planet are only a few millimeters in size, yet they pack such a punch that a driver could use a cellphone powered by these batteries to jump-start a dead car battery and then recharge the phone in the blink of an eye.

Developed by researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the new microbatteries out-power even the best supercapacitors and could drive new applications in radio communications and compact electronics.

Led by William P. King, the Bliss Professor of mechanical science and engineering, the researchers published their results in the April 16 issue of Nature Communications.

"This is a whole new way to think about batteries," King said. "A battery can deliver far more power than anybody ever thought. In recent decades, electronics have gotten small. The thinking parts of computers have gotten small. And the battery has lagged far behind. This is a microtechnology that could change all of that. Now the power source is as high-performance as the rest of it."

With currently available power sources, users have had to choose between power and energy. For applications that need a lot of power, like broadcasting a radio signal over a long distance, capacitors can release energy very quickly but can only store a small amount. For applications that need a lot of energy, like playing a radio for a long time, fuel cells and batteries can hold a lot of energy but release it or recharge slowly.

"There's a sacrifice," said James Pikul, a graduate student and first author of the paper. "If you want high energy you can't get high power; if you want high power it's very difficult to get high energy. But for very interesting applications, especially modern applications, you really need both. That's what our batteries are starting to do. We're really pushing into an area in the energy storage design space that is not currently available with technologies today."

The new microbatteries offer both power and energy, and by tweaking the structure a bit, the researchers can tune them over a wide range on the power-versus-energy scale.

The batteries owe their high performance to their internal three-dimensional microstructure. Batteries have two key components: the anode (minus side) and cathode (plus side). Building on a novel fast-charging cathode design by materials science and engineering professor Paul Braun's group, King and Pikul developed a matching anode and then developed a new way to integrate the two components at the microscale to make a complete battery with superior performance.

With so much power, the batteries could enable sensors or radio signals that broadcast 30 times farther, or devices 30 times smaller. The batteries are rechargeable and can charge 1,000 times faster than competing technologies imagine juicing up a credit-card-thin phone in less than a second. In addition to consumer electronics, medical devices, lasers, sensors and other applications could see leaps forward in technology with such power sources available.

"Any kind of electronic device is limited by the size of the battery until now," King said. "Consider personal medical devices and implants, where the battery is an enormous brick, and it's connected to itty-bitty electronics and tiny wires. Now the battery is also tiny."

Now, the researchers are working on integrating their batteries with other electronics components, as well as manufacturability at low cost.

"Now we can think outside of the box," Pikul said. "It's a new enabling technology. It's not a progressive improvement over previous technologies; it breaks the normal paradigms of energy sources. It's allowing us to do different, new things."

The National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research supported this work. King also is affiliated with the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology; the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory; the Micro and Nanotechnology Laboratory; and the department of electrical and computer engineering at the U. of I.

###

Editor's note: To reach William King, call 217-244-3864; email wpk@illinois.edu.

The paper, "High Power Lithium Ion Micro Batteries From Interdigitated Three-Dimensional Bicontinuous Nanoporous Electrodes," is available online at http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v4/n4/full/ncomms2747.html.


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-04/uoia-sis041613.php

jon jones rashad evans ufc jones vs evans watergate

Monday, April 15, 2013

Tesla Motors and Fisker Automotive: a tale of two electric cars

Tesla Motors will do well to distance itself from Fisker Automotive as much and as quickly as possible, as they really do have a different tale to tell, Stuebi writes.

By Richard T. Stuebi,?Guest blogger / April 15, 2013

A detail view of the Tesla Model X concept SUV logo and grille at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Mich. At the same time Tesla Motors was releasing good news, Fisker Automotive was making waves with its drastic downsizing.

James Fassinger/Reuters/File

Enlarge

Albert Einstein once said:? ?Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler.?? Pundits always pursue the former, but often fail to uphold the latter.

Skip to next paragraph Cleantech Blog

A premier site for commentary on clean tech, energy, and the green economy, Cleantech Blog is edited by longtime clean-tech industry investor and executive Neal Dikeman of Jane Capital Partners LLC, and venture capitalist and industry analyst Richard Stuebi. For more clean-tech news and analysis, click?here.

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Such has been the case recently in regards to the prospects for electric vehicles.? Will electric vehicles be commercially successful or won?t they?? As often happens, there is superficial evidence supporting both sides of the argument.

On one hand, you have?Tesla Motors (NASDAQ:? TSLA).? Tesla recently?announced that it had achieved its first quarterly profit, on the back of better-than-forecasted sales?of its new?Model S?sedan.

On the other hand, you have?Fisker Automotive.? At the same time that Tesla was releasing good news, Fisker was making waves with its?drastic downsizing, laying off 75% of its workforce.? Fisker?s main model, the Karma, is probably unfortunately named, as the company is certainly beset with misfortune these days.?

Swallowed ring recovered by NH police

MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) ? Police say they've got the $3,200 engagement ring a New Hampshire allegedly swallowed during an attempted jewelry store theft.

Authorities charged 52-year-old Ronald Perley with theft and falsifying physical evidence after they say X-rays showed the 14-karat white-gold ring with princess-cut diamonds inside him.

WMUR-TV (http://bit.ly/15cl7n3 ) reports Manchester police had recovered the ring as of Saturday.

Perley allegedly went into Bellman's Jewelers on Thursday asking about engagement rings. Workers said he grabbed a ring then swallowed it after being confronted.

Police say surveillance footage shows Perley taking the ring and putting his hand to his mouth.

Perley was being held on $50,000 bail. It's not clear if he has an attorney.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/swallowed-ring-recovered-nh-police-041648625.html

naomi watts Oscar Nominations 2013 Beasts of the Southern Wild

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Reliability of neuroscience research questioned

Reliability of neuroscience research questioned [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 10-Apr-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Philippa Walker
philippa.walker@bristol.ac.uk
44-117-928-7777
University of Bristol

New research has questioned the reliability of neuroscience studies, saying that conclusions could be misleading due to small sample sizes.

A team led by academics from the University of Bristol reviewed 48 articles on neuroscience meta-analysis which were published in 2011 and concluded that most had an average power of around 20 per cent a finding which means the chance of the average study discovering the effect being investigated is only one in five.

The paper, being published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience today [10 April], reveals that small, low-powered studies are 'endemic' in neuroscience, producing unreliable research which is inefficient and wasteful.

It focuses on how low statistical power caused by low sample size of studies, small effects being investigated, or both can be misleading and produce more false scientific claims than high-powered studies.

It also illustrates how low power reduces a study's ability to detect any effects, and shows that when discoveries are claimed, they are more likely to be false or misleading.

The paper claims there is substantial evidence that a large proportion of research published in scientific literature may be unreliable as a consequence.

Another consequence is that the findings are overestimated because smaller studies consistently give more positive results than larger studies. This was found to be the case for studies using a diverse range of methods, including brain imaging, genetics and animal studies.

Kate Button, from the School of Social and Community Medicine, and Marcus Munaf, from the School of Experimental Psychology, led a team of researchers from Stanford University, the University of Virginia and the University of Oxford.

She said: "There's a lot of interest at the moment in improving the reliability of science. We looked at neuroscience literature and found that, on average, studies had only around a 20 per cent chance of detecting the effects they were investigating, even if the effects are real. This has two important implications - many studies lack the ability to give definitive answers to the questions they are testing, and many claimed findings are likely to be incorrect or unreliable."

The study concludes that improving the standard of results in neuroscience, and enabling them to be more easily reproduced, is a key priority and requires attention to well-established methodological principles.

It recommends that existing scientific practices can be improved with small changes or additions to methodologies, such as acknowledging any limitations in the interpretation of results; disclosing methods and findings transparently; and working collaboratively to increase the total sample size and power.

###

Paper

'Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience' by Katherine Button, John Ioannidis, Claire Mokrysz, Brian Nosek, Jonathan Flint, Emma Robinson and Marcus Munafo in Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

For further information, please contact Philippa Walker in the University of Bristol's Press Office on 0117 928 7777 or philippa.walker@bristol.ac.uk


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Reliability of neuroscience research questioned [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 10-Apr-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Philippa Walker
philippa.walker@bristol.ac.uk
44-117-928-7777
University of Bristol

New research has questioned the reliability of neuroscience studies, saying that conclusions could be misleading due to small sample sizes.

A team led by academics from the University of Bristol reviewed 48 articles on neuroscience meta-analysis which were published in 2011 and concluded that most had an average power of around 20 per cent a finding which means the chance of the average study discovering the effect being investigated is only one in five.

The paper, being published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience today [10 April], reveals that small, low-powered studies are 'endemic' in neuroscience, producing unreliable research which is inefficient and wasteful.

It focuses on how low statistical power caused by low sample size of studies, small effects being investigated, or both can be misleading and produce more false scientific claims than high-powered studies.

It also illustrates how low power reduces a study's ability to detect any effects, and shows that when discoveries are claimed, they are more likely to be false or misleading.

The paper claims there is substantial evidence that a large proportion of research published in scientific literature may be unreliable as a consequence.

Another consequence is that the findings are overestimated because smaller studies consistently give more positive results than larger studies. This was found to be the case for studies using a diverse range of methods, including brain imaging, genetics and animal studies.

Kate Button, from the School of Social and Community Medicine, and Marcus Munaf, from the School of Experimental Psychology, led a team of researchers from Stanford University, the University of Virginia and the University of Oxford.

She said: "There's a lot of interest at the moment in improving the reliability of science. We looked at neuroscience literature and found that, on average, studies had only around a 20 per cent chance of detecting the effects they were investigating, even if the effects are real. This has two important implications - many studies lack the ability to give definitive answers to the questions they are testing, and many claimed findings are likely to be incorrect or unreliable."

The study concludes that improving the standard of results in neuroscience, and enabling them to be more easily reproduced, is a key priority and requires attention to well-established methodological principles.

It recommends that existing scientific practices can be improved with small changes or additions to methodologies, such as acknowledging any limitations in the interpretation of results; disclosing methods and findings transparently; and working collaboratively to increase the total sample size and power.

###

Paper

'Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience' by Katherine Button, John Ioannidis, Claire Mokrysz, Brian Nosek, Jonathan Flint, Emma Robinson and Marcus Munafo in Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

For further information, please contact Philippa Walker in the University of Bristol's Press Office on 0117 928 7777 or philippa.walker@bristol.ac.uk


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-04/uob-ron040913.php

oklahoma city thunder sunoco titanic ii babe ruth new jersey nets nba playoff schedule rondo