Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Easter by the numbers: How many Peeps will we eat?

Easter Sunday will cost $145.13 per person this year, and the marshmallow Peeps made per year could circle the earth twice. Easter by the numbers:?

By Lou Carzolo,?Contirbutor / March 31, 2013

Kevin Olson adds color to a snow sculpture by spraying Kool-Aid onto it in front of his house on John Street in Champaign, Ill., last week. Olson and his son Erick, an artist, finished the sculpture, modeled the after iconic Easter candy shapes of Peeps and a chocolate rabbit, on Tuesday night.

John Dixon/The News-Gazette/AP/File

Enlarge

With no disrespect meant whatsoever, Easter makes for some heavy cognitive dissonance. One the one hand, millions of Christians worldwide will mark the death and resurrection of Jesus. And on the other, you've got chocolate bunnies and jelly beans galore.

Skip to next paragraph Dealnews.com

is devoted to finding the best deals on consumer goods, whether or not they're from an advertiser. For more great offers visit dealnews.com, which works with advertisers to craft offers for readers.

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

And as with any other occasion on our calendars, Easter marks yet another holiday made for spending, and consuming copious quantities of chocolate. This year, the National Retail Federation estimates that the average celebrant will spend approximately $145.13 on candy, decor, apparel, and food. And after conducting our own Easter egg hunt for stats, we've got other numbers on tap regarding this Spring holiday.

So whether you're hiding eggs in the backyard or planning a big family brunch, here's the rundown on stats, spending, and trivia surrounding this holiday that dates back to the 4th century. Read on, and fist bump that hippity-hoppity Easter Bunny as he's passing by.

Easter Garb: $25.91 Per Person

The NRF tells us that much of this spending will be done on behalf of the kiddos, in the form of bright new outfits. And as the song "Easter Parade" hints, you can bet that some ladies will spend money on a new Easter bonnet, with all the frills upon it. But hey, guys get into the act, too. There are quite a few pictures on Jezebel from the 2011 Easter Parade in NYC, and we saw all manner of headgear from psuedo-flower pot puppy caps to frosting-pink TV-shaped boxes adorned with none other than rabbit ears.

Sweet Tooth Spending: $20.66 Per Person

Americans love their candy holidays: Halloween, Valentine's Day, Christmas, and 80% Cacao Chocolate Day (which is every day for this writer). While Valentine's tends to be a time for truffles and gift-box candy, it's jelly beans and chocolate bunnies that reign supreme come Easter Time. But as you might expect, there's some debate about the best way to consume a chocolate bunny. The folks at Statistic Brain, citing figures from the National Confectioner's Association, tell us that 3 in 4 Americans (76%) think choco-rabbits should be eaten ears first. And when you think about it, biting just about anywhere else constitutes cruelty to candy animals.

Peeps Made Per Day: 4.2 Million

If Christmas has the inedible, incredible fruitcake, then Easter has the Peep, a bizarre bit of culinary mystery food that seems both cool and, yes, cruel to eat. (These are baby chicks, people!) The factory that makes Peeps is cranking out enough of these sugar birdies in a year to circle the Earth twice, according to Business News Daily. By the way, it took 27 hours to create one Peeps marshmallow chick in 1953. Today, thanks to advances in technology, it takes six minutes. Also back in 1953, it took about 45 seconds to eat a Peep. Today, thanks to advances in the American appetite for strange junk food, it takes about six seconds.

Easter Jelly Beans Confectioned: 16 Billion

This one also comes to us from Statistic Brain, and it's a daunting, daunting number. We don't know how America's confectioners keep count. But here's how it breaks down: This are 2.3 jelly beans for every man, woman, and child on Planet Earth. Who knew a little orb of candy-coated sugar could prove such an Easter enticement? Variety-wise, the folks at Jelly Belly make their beans in 50 different flavors, including Cream Soda, Tangerine, Green Apple, and Root Beer. As for myself, I'm growing more worried each year that Jelly Belly will come out with a Christmas Fruitcake jelly bean, one that has the same chewing-on-a-tire consistency as the real thing.

An Easter Brunch for the Family: $45.26

Enough with junk food! The NRF estimates that spending on items for an Easter meal will cost about $45 range. What's fascinating is how much Easter grub varies from culture to culture, family to family. In my Italian-American family, Easter meant lasagna, chicken cutlets, meatballs, and little nougat candies called "torrone," which is Italian for "tower." (Here is a great recipe from Martha Stewart.) In a Polish household, the favorites include kielbasa, ham, and babka (a slightly sweet yeast bread). Among Mexican families, you might find fried plantains, nodal (a flat-leafed cactus), or shrimp covered with a traditional sauce called pippin, made with spices and pumpkin seeds. Yum!

Oldest Official Easter Parade: 137 Years Old

It's said that Irving Berlin took a really long time to write "Easter Parade" ? about 15 years, on and off ? and by the time the song became a hit in the 1930s, the parade tradition in the U.S. was already decades old. The first official parade dates to 1876, the year officials in Atlantic City, N.J. kicked off their promenade, hoping to draw crowds from Philadelphia's Centennial Exposition. But truth be told, the tradition was taken from New York City, which had its own Easter parades going (sort of) years before. New York City's Easter parades actually began by accident, in the mid-1800s, when well-heeled church patrons leaving services would stroll along 5th Avenue in their finery. Atlantic City's parade on the Boardwalk this year hardly seems a big deal; sadly, there's barely any mention of it anywhere online. But given all the city suffered in 2012, it seems as good a time as any to attend and wish the city a comeback season.

Oldest Wrapped Chocolate Easter Egg: 56 Years Old

Yup, that's right. While there's no way of counting how many Easter eggs will be dyed in how many nations, there's one egg that simply refuses to die: the one Judith Bowen, a 73-year-old from Wootton, Beds, England bought at age 17 for her mother. The full story recently appeared in the New York Daily News, and talks about how Bowen found the still-unopened, gold-wrapping covered egg at her mother's home after she had passed away in 2006. We're betting the shelf life of this egg has long since expired, too.

And so as Easter arrives, it's a good time for both reflection and celebration. No matter how you celebrate the holiday (and even if you don't), we can all look forward to it as a milestone for the beginning of spring. It's been too cold for too long in many parts of the U.S., yet no matter what the thermometer says on Easter Sunday, here's hoping it leaves a warm feeling in your heart.

Lou Carzolo is a contributor to Dealnews.com, where this article first appeared.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/76aA9MXdmd0/Easter-by-the-numbers-How-many-Peeps-will-we-eat

2013 lincoln mkz burger king mary j blige google project glass google goggles

Apps help parents monitor children's Internet use

By Natasha Baker

TORONTO (Reuters) - With smartphone and tablet users getting younger, new apps can help parents of 2-to-13-year-olds monitor and control their children's use of the Internet.

A Pew Research Center study shows that more than one-third of American teenagers own a smartphone, up from more than a fifth in 2011. For nearly half of these users, the phone is their main way of getting online, making it difficult for parents to supervise their behavior.

"When you have a smartphone, you basically have the Internet in your pocket wherever you are - away from your parents' eyes," said Anooj Shah, a partner in Toronto-based company Kytephone, which develops apps.

Kytephone's namesake app allows parents to control the apps and sites their children use and the people they receive texts and calls from.

The company on Monday released Kytetime for 13-to-17-year-olds. The new app has many of the same features as Kytephone but does not include the ability to block calls.

Earlier this month, Net Nanny, a monitoring software company, released a browser app for Apple Inc's iOS devices to filter Web content and block profanity.

"Smartphones and tablets have added new technology, with new challenges (for parents) - full Web browsing capability, unlimited texting, access to hundreds of thousands of good, bad and malicious apps," said Russ Warner, chief executive officer of the Salt Lake City-based company.

The Android version of Net Nanny, which sells for $12.99, can control which apps a child uses. The app is also available for iOS devices, with fewer applications, for $4.99.

The company is also introducing Net Nanny Social, a subscription, Web-based tool to help parents monitor problems such as cyberbullying, sexual predators and identity theft on social networks including Facebook and Twitter. The service costs $19.99 per year.

For parents of 2-to-8-year-olds, Boston-based Playrific has a free app with a locked browser that allows only content suitable for children, including educational videos, interactive games and books.

The app, available for Android, iPad and on the Web, curates content based on a child's interests, which it learns over time.

"Kids feel the limitless sense of what's on the Internet," said Playrific CEO Beth Marcus, "but the parents know that it's not really limitless."

(Editing by Patricia Reaney and Lisa Von Ahn)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/apps-help-parents-monitor-childrens-internet-154453413--sector.html

nfl draft d rose iman shumpert mayweather vs cotto

Monday, April 1, 2013

Readers Write: The tyranny of America's pro-gun majority; Do guns make us safer?

It may be the chorus most heard in these modern times: technology and the way we use it has killed etiquette entirely. (Thank you?). Fortunately, the good people at The?New York Times have set to work debunking this theory. In a perfectly polite article, Alex Williams explains?that not only is etiquette not dead in modern times, but also, modern times have brought entirely new ways to do "etiquette." And etiquette is everywhere, in venues old and new. Is it still etiquette, though?

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/readers-write-tyranny-americas-pro-gun-majority-guns-141214359--politics.html

nevada caucus ufc 143 what time does the super bowl start ben gazzara nfl hall of fame 2012 ufc diaz vs condit josephine baker

Your WrestleMania survival kit

Hand Sanitizer
Clip Purell?s Jelly Wrap Carriers to your backpack or key chain and we guarantee Kaitlyn won?t be sickened by your clammy hands. $18 for a pack of 6, purell.com

Sharpies!
The go-to marker for signature hunters, Sharpies are the best choice to ensure that 3MB?s autograph will last for generations. $3 for 2, sharpie.com

MetroCard
Pick up a 7-Day Unlimited MetroCard and jet from New York to New Jersey with ease! $29

Mountain Hardwear?s Ghost Whisperer Jacket
The Ghost Whisperer will help you brave spring chills. And if the sun comes out, it?s light enough so you won?t be sweating. $300, mountainhardwear.com

Wi-Fi Digital Camera
The Canon Powershot S110?s wi-fi capabilities let you post to your favorite social-media sites in no time without those pesky logins! $450, usa.canon.com

Extra Bag
Keep your swag in this rucksack by New Era. It?s big enough to hold your goodies, and is water-resistant, so it?ll be protected from rain, snow or spilled soft drinks. $85, neweracap.com

Gloves
The North Face?s Etip Gloves allow you to work your phone or iPod while your hands stay toasty inside the stretch-knit shell. $45, thenorthface.com

Poster Board
For $5 at STAPLES, you could craft a last-minute sign and make ?Mania history. Oh, you might want to pack a Thesaurus, too, in case you want to trash Damien Sandow. $5 for 10, staples.com

Pick-up the April issue of WWE Magazine ? available now or SUBSCRIBE TODAY?and save 72 percent off the newsstand sale price.

View Comments

Source: http://www.wwe.com/magazine/your-wrestlemania-survival-kit

indiana autoimmune disease news channel 9 insanity workout mass effect 3 launch trailer yelp huntsville al

Esophageal cancer risk may be reduced through a variety of lifestyle factors -- from taking aspirin to losing belly fat

Apr. 1, 2013 ? An estimated 20 million Americans have chronic heartburn. About 2 million of these people have Barrett's esophagus, a precancerous condition that affects the tube that carries food from the mouth to the stomach.

Barrett's-related esophageal cancer strikes about 10,000 Americans each year, and for unknown reasons the incidence of this cancer is rising faster than that of any other cancer in the U.S. More than 80 percent of patients with invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma die within five years of diagnosis.

While the condition is most prevalent in middle-aged white men, the incidence of Barrett's-related esophageal cancer is rising in women and African-Americans.

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center is home to the Seattle Barrett's Esophagus Program, a multidisciplinary effort conducted in collaboration with researchers at Brigham & Women's College and the University of California at San Francisco. This research team has shown that a systematic approach to early cancer detection can boost five-year survival rates from about 15 percent to more than 80 percent.

Other promising findings from the Seattle Barrett's Esophagus Program suggest that modifiable lifestyle factors -- from reducing obesity to quitting smoking -- also may prevent progression of Barrett's.

Below are highlights of research findings, all of which were made possible by funding from the National Cancer Institute, which suggest ways to prevent the condition from progressing to esophageal cancer.

An aspirin a day may keep cancer away

A Fred Hutch study published in 2007 in PLOS Medicine found that people with the most aggressive form of Barrett's may benefit the most from preventive therapy with aspirin, ibuprofen and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs. The same study, which followed about 250 Barrett's patients over 10 years, also identified a cluster of four known cancer biomarkers, or genetic abnormalities, in people with Barrett's that significantly increased their risk of developing esophageal cancer.

The researchers found that those with three or more of the cancer biomarkers upon enrollment in the study who also used aspirin or other NSAIDs had a 30 percent risk of developing esophageal cancer after 10 years, while those with the same biomarkers who did not use NSAIDs had a 79 percent risk of developing cancer within a decade of joining the study.

Ultimately the researchers hope that these biomarkers one day could be used in the clinic to identify which patients are most likely to develop esophageal cancer and therefore benefit from aggressive cancer surveillance via endoscopy and chemoprevention with aspirin and other NSAIDs. "Many Barrett's patients are subjected to overdiagnosis and overtreatment," said Brian Reid, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Seattle Barrett's Esophagus Program and member of the Human Biology Division at Fred Hutch. "These findings ultimately may help us identify high-risk patients who truly require frequent surveillance and low-risk patients who need no or less-frequent surveillance." The findings also may help determine which Barrett's patients may benefit most from a very cost-effective, noninvasive therapy in the form of aspirin or NSAIDs, Reid said.

It is hypothesized that aspirin and other NSAIDs may fight cancer by reducing chronic inflammation, which is a driving force behind the development of many cancers and other diseases. Specifically, NSAIDs have been shown to inhibit the production of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme. Disruption of this pathway slows the growth of abnormal cells and facilitates the normal process of programmed cell death, or apoptosis, both of which can thwart cancer development. NSAIDs are also believed to decrease the proliferation of cells and decrease the growth of blood vessels that supply blood to tumors.

Because this was a long-term observational study and not a clinical trial, the investigators cannot recommend NSAIDs for people with Barrett's and they advise anyone who considers taking these medications to do so under the direction of a physician, as they can cause side effects such as gastrointestinal bleeding.

Cholesterol-lowering drugs associated with reduced risk

Another Fred Hutch study published last year in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention that involved more than 400 patients with Barrett's found that overall, those who took statin drugs to lower their cholesterol had a 32 percent reduced risk of developing esophageal cancer. Among a subgroup of Barrett's patients with high-grade dysplasia, or cellular abnormality, those who took statins had a 59 percent reduced risk of esophageal cancer as compared to those who did not take such drugs. Those with high-grade dysplasia who took both statins and NSAIDs also had an 81 percent reduced risk of esophageal cancer as compared to patients who took neither.

Smoking and obesity -- in particular belly fat -- are other modifiable risk factors

Fred Hutch researchers earlier this year published a paper in PLOS One that looked at a variety of lifestyle factors -- from smoking and obesity to alcohol use -- to see whether they were associated with progression to esophageal cancer among a group of more than 400 patients with Barrett's.

They found that heavy smokers with Barrett's were more than twice as likely to develop esophageal cancer as non-smokers with Barrett's. The mechanisms underlying this relationship are unclear. In addition to the carcinogenic components of cigarette smoke and its potential effects on inflammation and cell proliferation, cigarette smoke also is thought to relax the esophageal sphincter, which could result in acid reflux, or chronic heartburn.

However, alcohol consumption did not appear to be a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma among people with Barrett's. (Alcohol use is, however, associated with a 10-fold increase is risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the other major type of esophageal cancer.)

The researchers also found that abdominal obesity, or belly fat, was more strongly associated with progression from Barrett's to cancer as compared to a high body-mass index. While this finding needs to be confirmed, if there is indeed an association between abdominal fat and progression to cancer, it may be due to the inflammatory effects of fatty tissue and/or an increase in chronic acid reflux due to the intra-abdominal pressure exerted by extra belly fat.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/~3/njuoIohbVhA/130401143146.htm

2013 Oscars academy awards Sally Field The Oscars Searching For Sugar Man george clooney Zero Dark Thirty

Drug maker Novartis loses India patent battle

NEW DELHI (AP) ? India's Supreme Court on Monday rejected drug maker Novartis AG's attempt to patent an updated version of a cancer drug in a landmark decision that health activists say ensures poor patients around the world will get continued access to cheap versions of lifesaving medicines.

Novartis had argued that it needed a patent to protect its investment in the cancer drug Glivec while activists said the drug did not merit intellectual property protection in India because it was not a new medicine.

The court's decision has global significance since India's $26 billion generic drug industry, which supplies much of the cheap medicine used in the developing world, could be stunted if Indian law allowed global drug companies to extend the lifespan of patents by making minor changes to medicines.

Once a drug's patent expires, generic manufacturers can legally produce it. They are able to make drugs at a fraction of the original manufacturer's cost because they don't carry out the expensive research and development.

Pratibha Singh, a lawyer for the Indian generic drug manufacturer Cipla, which makes a version of Glivec for less than a tenth of the original drug's selling price, said the court ruled that a patent could only be given to a new drug, and not to those which are only slightly different from the original.

"Patents will be given only for genuine inventions, and repetitive patents will not be given for minor tweaks to an existing drug," Singh told reporters outside the court.

Novartis called the ruling a "setback for patients," and said patent protection is crucial to fostering investment in research to develop new and better drugs.

"We brought this case because we strongly believe patents safeguard innovation and encourage medical progress," said Ranjit Shahani, Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Novartis India.

The ruling "will hinder medical progress for diseases without effective treatment options," he said.

The Swiss pharmaceutical giant has fought a legal battle in India since 2006 to patent a new version of Glivec, which is mainly used to treat leukemia and is known as Gleevec outside India and Europe. The earlier version of Glivec did not have an Indian patent because it was introduced into the country before the government adopted its first patent law in 2005. Novartis said Glivec is patented in nearly 40 other countries.

India's patent office rejected the company's patent application, arguing the drug was not a new medicine but an amended version of its earlier product. The patent authority cited a provision in the 2005 patent law aimed at preventing companies from getting fresh patents for making only minor changes to existing medicines ? a practice known as "evergreening."

Novartis appealed, arguing the drug was a more easily absorbed version of Glivec and that it qualified for a patent.

Anand Grover, a lawyer for the Cancer Patients Aid Association, which led the legal fight against Novartis, said the ruling Monday prevented the watering down of India's patent laws.

"This is a very good day for cancer patients. It's the news we have been waiting for for seven long years," he said.

Aid groups, including Medicins Sans Frontieres, have opposed Novartis' case, fearing that a victory for the Swiss drugmaker would limit access to important medicines for millions of poor people around the world.

Glivec, used in treating chronic myeloid leukemia and some other cancers, costs about $2,600 a month. Its generic version was available in India for around $175 per month.

"The difference in price was huge. The generic version makes it affordable to so many more poor people, not just in India, but across the world," said Y.K. Sapru, of the Mumbai-based cancer patients association.

"For cancer sufferers, this ruling will mean the difference between life and death. Because the price at which it was available, and considering it's the only lifesaving drug for chronic myeloid cancer patients, this decision will make a huge difference," Sapru said.

Leena Menghaney of Medicins Sans Frontieres said India would continue to grant patents on new medicines.

"This doesn't mean that no patents will be granted. Patents will continue to be granted by India, but definitely the abusive practice of getting many patents on one drug will be stopped," Menghaney said.

The judgment would ensure that the prices of lifesaving drugs would come down as many more companies would produce generic versions.

"We've seen this happening with HIV medicines, where the cost of HIV treatment has come down from $10,000 to $150 per year. Cancer treatment costs have come down by 97 percent in the case of many cancer drugs," she said.

"This decision is incredibly important. The Supreme Court decision will save a lot of lives in the coming decades," Menghaney said.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/drug-maker-novartis-loses-india-patent-battle-092200333--finance.html

Nexus 7 KDKA Pumpkin Carving Ideas Hurricane Sandy path sandy Time Change 2012 Marcus Lattimore

The Politically Incorrect Caucus: 6 Controversy-Prone House Members

Rep. Don Young's ethnically charged reference to Hispanic ranch workers as "wetbacks" on an Alaska radio program was politically incorrect, but he's far from the only House member to court controversy. You can see that reflected to some degree in the overall approval rating for Congress, which Gallup puts at 13 percent.

Yet controversial comments aren't always enough to sink a candidate. Here are six representatives whose remarks made headlines and drew criticism from political foes -- and who got elected anyway.

Alan Grayson, a Democrat from Orlando, is back for his second term in Congress after a two-year hiatus. He made up for missing the 112th Congress's budget process recently with some heated rhetoric about Paul Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee. ?He wants Americans to work until they die; he wants poor people who get sick not be able to see a doctor, not to get the care they need, not to get better. He wants them to die, and he wants an America that consists of nothing but cheap labor for his corporate patrons.?

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

?

Steve King could be running for Senate in Iowa in 2014, an open seat since Sen. Tom Harkin announced his retirement. Democrats, and possible primary challengers, will have no shortage of rhetorical ammunition to use against the conservative lawmaker. For example, he couldn't resist wading into the conversation about "legitimate rape," touched off last year by former Rep. and Senate candidate Todd Akin, R-Mo,. As a cosponsor of a bill called the ?No Taxpayers Funding for Abortion Act,? King was asked if exemptions should be made for victims of statutory rape or incest. "Well, I just haven't heard of that being a circumstance that's been brought to me in any personal way,? he said. ?I'd be open to discussion about that subject matter.?

(AP Photo/David Goldman)

?

Phil Gingrey is making headlines now for recently announcing his candidacy for the Senate seat being vacated by Sen. Saxby Chambliss, who's retiring, in Georgia. But it wasn't long ago when Gingrey grabbed some ink (and SEO headlines?) for weighing in on Akin's comments. If you need a refresher, Gingrey told the Marietta Daily Journal that Akin was "partially right" when he suggested there was a way for women who endure "legitimate rape" to "shut that whole thing down." Gingrey's comments could actually cost him politically if Karl Rove's new Conservative Victory Project, which aims to help "electable" conservatives, plays in the Peach State GOP primary. Plus there will be some competition for Gingrey. Rep. Paul Broun, who also has a history of using sharp language, is also running, and Reps. Tom Price and Jack Kingston are also reportedly considering running.

(PORTRAIT INNOVATIONS) ()

Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman has a reputation for confidently and a little stridently wading into political fights. An ardent small-government conservative, Stockman invited gun-rights activist and rocker Ted Nugent to the State of the Union this year, is being tagged as the "new Michele Bachmann," and drew criticism for calling the Violence Against Women Act "horrible" for "helping liberals." He also recently criticized the legislation for aiming to protect transgender citizens. "What really bothers ? it?s called a women?s act, but then they have men dressed up as women, they count that. Change-gender, or whatever. How is that ? how is that a woman?? Stockman said.

(AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

?

Louie Gohmert, the Texas Republican, is widely known to those in Washington--and avid C-SPAN watchers?as the last House member speaking on the floor after the chamber adjourns and his colleagues leave. He's also known for his controversial speeches and positions. He recently made headlines when he confronted a Park Police officer who ticketed him for parking in a reserved space near the Lincoln Memorial. But Gohmert has also said some controversial things in his eight years in Congress. After the fatal shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary, Gohmert was among the first lawmakers to call for arming officials at schools. He also said during a radio interview last year that the shooting attack in Aurora, Colo., was the result of "ongoing attacks on Judeo-Christian beliefs."

(AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

? ()

Michele Bachmann, the Minnesota Republican and erstwhile presidential candidate, casts herself as a constant foil to President Obama. There's nothing inherently controversial in that, but in two recent instances she suggested that 70 percent of every dollar the government intends to use for the poor actually goes to a bureaucrat and that Obama's White House includes $1.4 billion in "perks and excess." The Washington?Post?fact-checker awarded each of the statements four Pinocchios. "But there really aren?t enough Pinocchios for such misleading use of statistics in a major speech," wrote The Post's Glenn Kessler.?

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/politically-incorrect-caucus-6-controversy-prone-house-members-121959455--politics.html

toysrus how to carve a turkey ipad 2